Aroma: Slightly acrid smoke aroma. Malty background, light sweetness. Hint of chocolate / dark roast. Hop aroma very low.
Appearance: Tan head with rocky texture, ok retention, dark black body.
Taste: Light malt sweetness, somewhat acrid smoke, moderate woody bitterness. It taste a little tart. Bitterness is moderate. Has kind of a woody note.
Mouthfeel: A little thin. Carbonation is low. Slight astringency at the end.
Overall: Ok but not super characterful. I'd like a little more sweetness, more body, and more complexity. Use more hops at the end. Perhaps use some Munich or Maris Otter malt, and higher mash temp.
Wednesday, May 9, 2018
Tuesday, May 1, 2018
Sour Solera 2nd Pull Tasting
Aroma: Sourness, lactic with vinegar notes. Lemony rind quality. Some light fruit esters, bretty funk. No hops, malt aroma is barely noticeable. As it warms a kind of woody aroma comes through.
Appearance: Golden yellow body. Haziness from yeast slurry. Fluffy white head with small bubbles immediately after pour, but dissipates after a few minutes.
Taste: I get the lemony rhind / pith quality at the start. Aftertaste is quite sour and has a bit of acetic harshness. It also has some woody / tannic quality in the background. Quite dry. Malt flavors barely there, covered up by the sourness.
Mouthfeel: Moderately carbed, somehow though it has a bit of creaminess in the texture.
Overall: A bit too harshly sour - too much viengar. I find the tannic quality a bit weird. Wish I could identify it more precisely. Will keep the solera going just as an experiment.
Appearance: Golden yellow body. Haziness from yeast slurry. Fluffy white head with small bubbles immediately after pour, but dissipates after a few minutes. Taste: I get the lemony rhind / pith quality at the start. Aftertaste is quite sour and has a bit of acetic harshness. It also has some woody / tannic quality in the background. Quite dry. Malt flavors barely there, covered up by the sourness.
Mouthfeel: Moderately carbed, somehow though it has a bit of creaminess in the texture.
Overall: A bit too harshly sour - too much viengar. I find the tannic quality a bit weird. Wish I could identify it more precisely. Will keep the solera going just as an experiment.
Tuesday, March 6, 2018
Czech Pale Lager Review
Appearance: Golden body with moderate chill haze, billowing white head with good retention and lacing.
Aroma: Grainy pils malt growing a bit more intense as it warms. I think some diacetyl is there as well. Light Saaz type hop aroma.
Taste: Again moderately pils-type grainy / malty character. Sweetness is low- just a hint, but fairly dry. Bitterness is moderate and well-balanced with malt flavors. I'd say it's a more balanced to the bitter than malty side but not by much. It has an earthy bitterness and to me a slightly minerally aftertaste.
Mouthfeel: Light body, moderate carbonation. Maybe slight diacetyl slickness in the body.
Overall: Pretty good but may not be quite as good as my first attempt at this style. Probably it's key to use really fresh ingredients. In this case the pils malt was approaching a year old, so not optimal. But nevertheless this turned out to be a pleasant beer. Might give this low 30s.
Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Czech Lager and Kellerbier Brewday
Czech Pale Lager
Recipe Specifications
--------------------------
Boil Size: 7.54 gal
Post Boil Volume: 5.89 gal
Batch Size (fermenter): 5.25 gal
Bottling Volume: 4.85 gal
Estimated OG: 1.044 SG
Estimated Color: 4.3 SRM
Estimated IBU: 29.5 IBUs
Brewhouse Efficiency: 72.00 %
Est Mash Efficiency: 77.5 %
Boil Time: 90 Minutes
Ingredients:
------------
Amt Name Type # %/IBU
5.25 gal Boston, MA Water 1 -
5.00 g Calcium Chloride (Mash 60.0 mins) Water Agent 2 -
7 lbs 8.0 oz Pilsner (2 Row) Ger (2.0 SRM) Grain 3 86.9 %
7.0 oz Caravienne Malt (22.0 SRM) Grain 4 5.1 %
6.0 oz Wheat Malt, Ger (2.0 SRM) Grain 5 4.3 %
5.0 oz Acid Malt (3.0 SRM) Grain 6 3.6 %
0.50 oz Magnum [12.00 %] - Boil 40.0 min Hop 7 20.6 IBUs
1.00 oz Saaz [2.80 %] - Boil 10.0 min Hop 8 4.0 IBUs
1.00 oz Saaz [2.80 %] - Boil 5.0 min Hop 9 2.2 IBUs
1.00 oz Saaz [2.80 %] - Steep/Whirlpool 15.0 mi Hop 10 2.7 IBUs
2.0 pkg Saflager Lager (DCL/Fermentis #W-34/70) Yeast 11 -
Mash Schedule: 154F, Batch Sparge, Mash Out
Total Grain Weight: 8 lbs 10.0 oz
----------------------------
Name Description Step Temperat Step Time
Mash Step Add 13.78 qt of water at 168.2 F 156.0 F 45 min
Mash Step Decoct 3.67 qt of mash and boil it 168.0 F 10 min
Sparge: Batch sparge with 2 steps (Drain mash tun , 5.87gal) of 168.0 F water
Notes:
------
http://byo.com/stories/issue/item/3244-czech-pale-lager-style-profile
5 g calcium chloride (CaCl2) to the mash
3 g CaCl2 to the sparge water.
Created with BeerSmith 2 - http://www.beersmith.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kellerbier
Recipe Specifications
--------------------------
Boil Size: 7.26 gal
Post Boil Volume: 6.51 gal
Batch Size (fermenter): 5.50 gal
Bottling Volume: 5.00 gal
Estimated OG: 1.050 SG
Estimated Color: 4.9 SRM
Estimated IBU: 32.7 IBUs
Brewhouse Efficiency: 72.00 %
Est Mash Efficiency: 81.8 %
Boil Time: 60 Minutes
Ingredients:
------------
Amt Name Type # %/IBU
5.50 gal Boston, MA Water 1 -
5.00 g Calcium Chloride (Mash 60.0 mins) Water Agent 2 -
6 lbs Vienna Malt (3.5 SRM) Grain 3 56.5 %
4 lbs Pilsen (BestMälz) (1.5 SRM) Grain 4 37.6 %
6.0 oz Melanoiden Malt (20.0 SRM) Grain 5 3.5 %
4.0 oz Acid Malt (3.0 SRM) Grain 6 2.4 %
1.00 oz Mandarina Bavaria [9.20 %] - Boil 15.0 m Hop 7 14.8 IBUs
1.00 oz Mandarina Bavaria [9.20 %] - Boil 10.0 m Hop 8 10.8 IBUs
1.00 oz Mandarina Bavaria [9.20 %] - Boil 5.0 mi Hop 9 5.9 IBUs
1.00 oz Mandarina Bavaria [9.20 %] - Boil 1.0 mi Hop 10 1.3 IBUs
2.0 pkg Southern German Lager (White Labs #WLP83 Yeast 11 -
Mash Schedule: 152F, Mash Out, Batch Sparge
Total Grain Weight: 10 lbs 10.0 oz
----------------------------
Name Description Step Temperat Step Time
Mash Step Add 14.28 qt of water at 165.0 F 152.0 F 60 min
Mash Step Add 8.50 qt of water at 200.0 F 168.0 F 10 min
Sparge: Batch sparge with 2 steps (Drain mash tun , 3.09gal) of 168.0 F water
Notes:
------
Created with BeerSmith 2 - http://www.beersmith.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Starter for the Kellerbier made 1 week earlier, fermented and cooled to 45F.
Brewed 1/13/17
Czech Lager: Got 1.046 OG, pretty good. Force cooled to 60F, then in fridge to cool to 45F. Pitched 2 packets of rehydrated yeast after oxygenating 30 seconds. Fermentation seemed slow to start - perhaps expected due to the cool pitching temp. Got only about 5 gal into the bucket, a little less than hoped.
Kellerbier: Got 1.054 OG. Cooled to 45F, racked, oxygenated 75 seconds, pitched decanted starter. Fermentation was visibly starting by 36 hours after pitching.
Brewday went fairly well, except that the cold and dry weather resulted in greater boil off than expected, so less volume of wort into the fermentor. At racking, both worts were very clear and only minimal trub made it into the fermenting vessels.
Fermentation on the Kellerbier was much quicker to take off and appeared more vigorous than that of the Czech Lager. Plus the temp in my basement maxed out at around 60F, so the diacetyl rest was only at around 58F for a few days. Perhaps I could have let it rest there a bit longer. In any case, as of Feb. 2, the diacetyl rest, such as it was, had been done, and fermentation appeared complete.
Crash cooled to 33F for 2 days, then on Feb 4 racked both beers to keg and began force carbing at 12PSI. For the Czech Lager, was careful to rack clear wort, without picking up much yeast / trub. Allowed some into the Kellerbier, as may be appropriate for the style.
Czech Lager: 1.011 FG. Sample tasted OK but maybe a hint of green apple.
Kellerbier: 1.013 FG. Sample tasted kind of fruity hoppy. I did use a lot of aroma and flavor hops for this one.
Both beers tasted a bit "green".
Labels:
brew day,
czech lager,
kellerbier,
lager,
recipe
Tuesday, January 2, 2018
Parti-Gyle Hefe Review
Appearance: Billowing off-white head, fairly clear amber body with carbonation bubbles visibly rising to the top.
Aroma: Light clove like and phenolic character with some grainy notes in the background. Not sure that I would identify it as a hefewessein just by smell. A small sulfury quality, which fortunately has decreased over the month or so it's been in the bottle.
Taste: Pretty similar to the aroma. Some clovey and phenolic notes. Dry and moderate bitterness. Too bitter for the style. Lacks the banana taste and subtle yeast-derived flavors of a good hefe.
Mouthfeel: Moderate body, high carbonation.
Overall: Ok, but not to style - lacks the right yeast character and refreshing body of real hefe. But, not terrible, especially considering it's experimental. My guess is that a different yeast strain would improve this beer.
Aroma: Light clove like and phenolic character with some grainy notes in the background. Not sure that I would identify it as a hefewessein just by smell. A small sulfury quality, which fortunately has decreased over the month or so it's been in the bottle.
Taste: Pretty similar to the aroma. Some clovey and phenolic notes. Dry and moderate bitterness. Too bitter for the style. Lacks the banana taste and subtle yeast-derived flavors of a good hefe.
Mouthfeel: Moderate body, high carbonation.
Overall: Ok, but not to style - lacks the right yeast character and refreshing body of real hefe. But, not terrible, especially considering it's experimental. My guess is that a different yeast strain would improve this beer.
Wednesday, November 15, 2017
Oaky Smokey Porter Review
Aroma: A combination of oak chips and smoke, but dominated by oak. A bit one dimensional. Some toasty Munich malt in the background. Hop aroma is none. Sweetness is low.
Appearance: Very dark with some ruby highlights. Thick, persistent head with small bubbles.
Taste: Starts with some toasty and bready malt notes, crystal sweetness, and surprisingly only a hint of smoke. Dark coffee or chocolate note as well. At the end, an oaky quality. Not super tannic or tart. The oaky quality is one dimensional, I find. Bitterness is moderate with some earthy hop character.
Mouthfeel: Pretty thick and chewy. Carbonation is low to moderate. Oak leaves a dry impression on the aftertaste.
Overall: OK. I wish the smoke came through more and that the oak character was more complex and subtle.Next time will use cubes of varying toast instead of chips.
Appearance: Very dark with some ruby highlights. Thick, persistent head with small bubbles.
Taste: Starts with some toasty and bready malt notes, crystal sweetness, and surprisingly only a hint of smoke. Dark coffee or chocolate note as well. At the end, an oaky quality. Not super tannic or tart. The oaky quality is one dimensional, I find. Bitterness is moderate with some earthy hop character.
Mouthfeel: Pretty thick and chewy. Carbonation is low to moderate. Oak leaves a dry impression on the aftertaste.
Overall: OK. I wish the smoke came through more and that the oak character was more complex and subtle.Next time will use cubes of varying toast instead of chips.
Monday, November 13, 2017
Brett Saison Review
This review is for the 3 gallon part of the Sour 6 gallon brewed on March 19, 2017.
Aroma: Light bretty funk notes. Grainy pils in the background. Surprisingly doesn't have much in the way of fruity Belgian esters. Hop aroma absent.
Appearance: Billowing white head with very thick texture, clear straw body.
Taste: Dry, bretty funk notes. Pils malt mostly hidden by brett character. Some tannic quality from the wood. Slight tartness. Bitterness seems moderate but could be confusing it with the tannic dryness.
Mouthfeel: Surprisingly full bodied but also effervescent. Weird.
Overall: Ok, not great. Lacks brightness and the refreshing lemony character of some brett beers.
Aroma: Light bretty funk notes. Grainy pils in the background. Surprisingly doesn't have much in the way of fruity Belgian esters. Hop aroma absent.
Appearance: Billowing white head with very thick texture, clear straw body.
Taste: Dry, bretty funk notes. Pils malt mostly hidden by brett character. Some tannic quality from the wood. Slight tartness. Bitterness seems moderate but could be confusing it with the tannic dryness.
Mouthfeel: Surprisingly full bodied but also effervescent. Weird.
Overall: Ok, not great. Lacks brightness and the refreshing lemony character of some brett beers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)